Please find below the summary report
extracted from Overseas Environmental Key Performance Indicator (KPI)sheet for the month of August2017.
1. Year to Date
No
|
Project Name
|
Year To Date
|
No. of Incident
|
No. of
BP/LL
|
No. of Complaint
|
No of Env.
Violation
|
No. of HQ
Developed Training Given
|
||||||||
Submitted
On-Time
|
NMI
|
SI
|
MI1
|
LI
|
MI2
|
MI3
|
BP
|
LL
|
Ext
|
Int
|
|||||
Yes
|
No
|
||||||||||||||
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend:(NMI) Near
Miss Incident, (SI) Slight Incident, (MI1) Minor Incident, (LI) Localize Incident, (MI2) Major Incident,
(MI3) Massive Incident, (BP) Best Practice, (LL) Lesson
Learn, (Ext) External, (Int) Internal
Note: Completed projects already removed from monthly data but retained
in YEAR-TO-DATE to hold an accuracy of this year’s overall data.
2.
This
Month
No
|
Project Name
|
This Month
|
No. of Incident
|
No. of
BP/LL
|
No. of Complaint
|
No of Env.
Violation
|
No. of Main HSE
Developed Training Given
|
||||||||
Submitted
On-Time
|
NMI
|
SI
|
MI1
|
LI
|
MI2
|
MI3
|
BP
|
LL
|
Ext
|
Int
|
|||||
Yes
|
No
|
||||||||||||||
1
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
3
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
5
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
6
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
8
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
9
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
10
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
11
|
|
|
-
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
12
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
13
|
|
|
-
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Total
|
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Highlight
1. All projects (13) submitted their respective
environmental KPI report on time.
2. If the project is already completed, the construction works and removed from the
tracking sheet.
3. One (1) near miss incident recorded in project
related to a hydraulic oil leak of less than 10 litres.
4. All Projects shared their acceptable best practices&
others failed to provide copy as evidence.
5. No recorded environmental violation and complaints
for the month.
6. Nine (9) HQ training materials have been used
by the project.
7. Gradually declined the number of environmental
training for two consecutive months from 45, 11 to 9 sessions.
8. Other highlighted information’s.
· Conducted 3 risk assessmentsa bit lower than previous
month.
· Slightly decreased the number of environmental
meeting across the projects from 48 to 41.
· A number of eight (8) subcontractors complied
with one per week ratio of HSE site inspection.
· Out of 13 / 9 SECL projects complied with the inspection
ratio of once per week.
· Below items resulted with satisfactory compares
with previous results.
No.
|
Total Collected Data - July
2017
|
August 2017
Equivalent Per Man-hour
|
Versus
|
July 2017
Equivalent Per Man-hour
|
Remarks
|
|
1
|
Waste generated 19,039,086 kg
|
2.26
|
vs
|
2.29
|
|
|
2
|
Waste recycled 7,857 kg
|
0.001
|
vs
|
0.004
|
|
|
3
|
Waste sent to land fill 18,457,970 kg
|
2.19
|
vs
|
2.20
|
|
|
4
|
Waste incinerated 558,093 kg
|
0.066
|
vs
|
0.068
|
|
|
5
|
Water usage 170,362,657 li
|
20.22
|
vs
|
18.71
|
|
|
6
|
Wastewater generation 63,114,519 li
|
7.49
|
vs
|
5.83
|
|
|
7
|
Diesel usage for vehicle 1,751,177 li
|
0.2078
|
vs
|
0.1912
|
|
|
8
|
Petrol usage 287,451 li
|
0.03
|
vs
|
0.04
|
|
|
9
|
LPG usage 2,478 li
|
0.00029
|
vs
|
0.00028
|
|
|
10
|
Generator energy consumption 3,348,696 kwh
|
0.40
|
vs
|
0.46
|
|
|
11
|
Grid energy consumption 951,521 kwh
|
0.11
|
vs
|
0.10
|
|
|
3.
Positive ImpactForContinual Reporting
1. Energized the positive involvement of HQ &
Project teams.
2.
Both team confidently discussed the arising concerns
with transparency.
3.
Strengthenedthe harmonious relationship as to work
&synchronize on same framework.
4. Gathered data’s to manage efficientlythe
environmental issues &improvements.
4.
Recommendation
1.
Refers on table above; the projects needs more effort to
deliver positive impacts.
2.
Address to sustain & improve both Main & Subcontractor’s
inspection system to achieve the target ratio.
3.
Sustain to submit the Environmental KPI report on or
before 14thof the month including waste disposal report.
4.
Improve the number of training sessions to increase
the level of HSE awareness; there should be a target of 24 hours per person per
year.
6.
Proper coordination with construction team for the daily
work activity.
7.
Must practice to reuse “if possible” the stored solid
waste materials on sites.
8.
All sequences of work must be cleared and understood by
designated Environmental Officer.
9.
Immediately convey any arising concern’s to
construction team; if needed inform the HQ team.
10.
Continually share copies of environmental BP & LL in
a monthly basis.
11.
Advise to find localwaste recycling company and get contract
with them for possible reduction ofwaste.
12.
Continually expand to involve subcontractors in Environmental
sustainability program.
13.
Improve to achieve 100% inspection to waste dump-site and
arrangesummary report for the visits.
14.
Vigilantly supervise any testing activitysuch as hydro,
radioactive, and others.
15.
Strengthen to have full support on the existing environmental
management program.
16.
Responsibly inform the HQ team in advance for any changes
of environmental staff.
5.
Conclusion
A robust support from the overseas teams was triggered to ignite the
reporting system predominantly on the Environmental KPI data’s. Evidently our
team stood on right directions towards environmental management implementation, inspection,
monitoring, assessment, and reporting schemes. As per mentioned previously that
this report generates huge impact listing the overall and specific focus area
for improvements. Confidently and intensely recommended to address the above mentioned improvement
items leading to sustain the effectiveness of the existing environmental management
program on-sites.Any difficulties may possibly arise do not falter to discuss
with the Site HSSE team, and if needed notify the Main HSE team for speedy
assistance.
No comments:
Post a Comment